tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] Con rods

To: "Tigers" <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Con rods
From: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrrr@peoplepc.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:30:36 -0800
> also, i _think_ 289 hipo rod is same dimensions as boss 302 rod, as boss 
> 302
> used a different crank but i could be wrong.  just something i remembered
> reading.


There were actually 2 different "Boss" 302 rods... both beefier than stock 
with the larger 3/8 rod bolts.
The C9ZZ-6200-B rods were 5.155 inches center-to-center. Same length as hipo 
289.
And the rare C90Z-6200-B were the shorter 5.090 inch length. Now 
un-obtanium. I have a set in my old 322 c.i. stroker motor. It was done back 
in 1970 before small block strokers became commonplace.

Bob H 
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html


Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>