I, too, would help with fact checking the info on Wiki. I don't remember the
entry having many blatant problems, but I would join the Tiger gang to put
force behind making what corrections need to be made. Not to single out writer
Frank Markus, but with the relatively new Wiki qualifications that whatever you
try to correct must be from some sort of periodical, like Motor Trend (Mr.
Markus is a technical writer there), I would push Wiki to respect owners and
folks who've been studying and collecting Tiger history for years. There are a
handful of claims about the building and sale of Tigers which have two sides to
them, and I feel, for completeness sake, both sides should be included in any
account of our cars. And, yes, it will mean going through some of the Tiger
'bibles', like Taylor, Carroll, Langworth, Robson and maybe others, and I can
tell you from personal experience that some toes of the Tiger faithful might
get stepped on in the effort to
present as complete an account of the Tiger history as we can as a group.
Rande Bellman
_______________________________________________
tigers@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net
|