triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rh, A Arm Assembly

To: "L.D. Hooven" <dirty_howi@hotmail.com>, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: rh, A Arm Assembly
From: "Atwell (Buff) Haines" <carbuff@scooter.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 21:16:53
At 10:21 AM 12/1/97 PST, L.D. Hooven wrote:
>In poking around my 79 spitfire, i noticed something strange, the rh 
>front a-arm and sway bar link are bailing wired together.  it did not 
>appear that the a-arm itself was cracked or broken and i didn't want to 
>cut the wire for fear of sending the entire right front corner crashing 
>to the ground where i could not get my jack under it to raise it again 
>(it's tough enough to do with both tires fully inflated).  my question 
>is has anyone seen where the bolt, that is apparant in the vic-brit 
>catalog mechanical drawing, has broken off. if so, should i replace the 
>entire sway arm assembly or just the links. ( i know change in pairs)  
>or am i looking at a new rh suspension?  i also know that there is not 
>much that a little bailing wire and duct tape cant fix, but not wanting 
>to fall apart on the motorway is also a great concern.  it is also not 
>apparent on the catalog mechanical drawing if the sway linkage goes in 
>front of or behind the struts/shock spring combo. ( if memory serves it 
>is in what would be considered front when facing the suspension).

Greetings, Larry,

The sway bar link assembly fits in to the control arm mounting bracket from
the REAR side of the car (that is, the link, item 12 on page 123 of the VB
catalogue, is positioned inside the control arm and the attaching nut and
washer go forward of the arm).  

If the broken bolt you mention is #10, then the stud #8 is broken, and must
be removed from the sway bar.   Then new parts can be installed.   Might be
just as easy to look at the left side to see the proper fitment.


Atwell (Buff) Haines
'79 Spitfire FM96062

Succasunna, NJ USA
CarBuff@scooter.net
"There are three types of people in this world: 
those that are good with numbers, and those that aren't."





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>