triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: HP vs topspeed

To: "'r-james@tamu.edu'" <r-james@tamu.edu>
Subject: RE: HP vs topspeed
From: "Wages, Jeffrey" <bzw8@cdc.gov>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 16:05:16 -0500
Cc: "'Triumphs List'" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
does this account for a crosswind?  what if there is a tailwind?  what if
you break wind?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-james@tamu.edu [SMTP:r-james@tamu.edu]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 1998 6:45 AM
> To:   triumphs@autox.team.net
> Subject:      HP vs topspeed
> 
> 
> >However I found the formula to calculate the HPs on the clutch of a TR 6.
> >All you need to know is the exact top speed of your TR 6. You can also
> use 
> >it to calculate the HPs you need to get a desired top speed.
> 
> >HP on the clutch = (speed in km/h) EXP 3  /  37 EXP 3
> 
> >(37 is the product of all the drag factors of a TR 6 with  cw, front 
> >area, drag from tires, gearbox and wheel bearings etc. considered . 
> >Ragtop up.)
> 
> Very interesting; but why isn't this HP at the rear wheels, not at the
> flywheel...?   Has the loss in the drive train been built into the
> formula?
> 
> Where does the formula come from?  The only way I could imagine to develop
> such a formula is by getting dynomometer results on a series of cars and
> then document their top speeds, and develop an emperical curve of
> HP.vs.speed.
> If done in this way, then it is a measure of power as the dyno measures
> it,
> (at the rear wheels, right?)
> 
> 
> Ray
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------
> Ray W. James, P.E., Ph.D.
> Texas Transportation Institute
> Civil Engineering Department
> Texas A&M University
> College Station, TX 77843
> Phone (409)845-7436; Fax (409)845-3410
> E-mail: r-james@tamu.edu
> Date: 12/21/98   Time: 11:45:12 AM
> -------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>