| To: | "michael l. cook" <mlcooknj@bellatlantic.net>, bwarner@mediaone.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: "Rover may be a Triumph" |
| From: | "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@server1.mail.virginia.edu> |
| Date: | Wed, 08 Mar 2000 07:12:55 -0500 |
| Cc: | GuyotLeonF@aol.com, triumphs@autox.team.net, FOT <fot@autox.team.net>, Stephen Phillips <Stephen@f-phillips.freeserve.co.uk> |
| References: | <1c.14cf750.25f6ece4@aol.com><38C5A9DF.2C5F@mediaone.net> |
At 10:38 PM 3/7/00 -0500, michael l. cook wrote: >The Triumph name is probably almost gone here. Not being disloyal but I don't >understand why they aren't selling something with an MG badge in this market. Given that most of us have had our Triumphs called a "nice MG" more than once, it seems clear that the MG name has more recognition than Triumph to the average American. Cheers, John Lye rjl6n@Virginia.edu |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TR6 pan removal, Trevor Jordan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Diff oil-which one, Michael Ferguson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: "Rover may be a Triumph", Michael D. Porter |
| Next by Thread: | RE: "Rover may be a Triumph", Westerdale, Bob |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |