triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Magazine article

To: <peb3@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: Magazine article
From: "jonmac" <jonmac@ndirect.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 08:29:54 +0100
Cc: "Triumph List" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Phillip Barnes wrote:
No mention is made about why, other
than to say that the new car should certainly have been better than a
40 year old car, nor is there any comparison discussed.

Maybe not a direct comparison car for car but has technology made the
specific advances we might *reasonably* expect? Some years ago I did a very
long journey in a brand new Land Rover Discovery TD5 and hated every minute.
It was noisy, uncomfortable and utterly gutless. A few days later, I did an
even longer trip in a 1968 Triumph 2000 with 178,000 on the clock and it
appealed for every reason the Disco didn't. Modern and up-to-date the Disco
may be, but I wouldn't have one as a gift.

Jonmac



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.637 / Virus Database: 408 - Release Date: 20/03/04





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>