triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Model T (was : TR4 Rear Seal: Leaking up hill) (no LBC)

To: Randall Young <ryoung@navcomtech.com>
Subject: Re: Model T (was : TR4 Rear Seal: Leaking up hill) (no LBC)
From: Peter Fullam <pfullam@nycap.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 00:26:24 -0400
Cc: Triumphs <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <NCBBKDNEEKEOHAOIIOIIEEOFGPAA.ryoung@navcomtech.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Model Ts were driven up steep hills in reverse because it was the lowest 
ratio in the box. Car full of people and 20 hp? Think about it. 

Cheers

Pete F

Randall Young wrote:

>Does anyone know the other common reason that Model T's were driven up hills
>in reverse ?
>
>  
>
>>>'Course other weird stuff happend back then in the late 20's,
>>>      
>>>
>>early 30's.
>>    
>>
>>>My uncle once used bacon rind for rod bearing(s) to get back home.  ...I
>>>don't have a clue what prompted THAT little adventure.  And while he was
>>>fond of a tall tale, it was usually only by adding drama to a
>>>      
>>>
>>true story.
>>    
>>
>>Ooops, guess not. My uncle wouldn't have had bacon rind.  That story was
>>about the use of the leather tongue cut out of a shoe for a rod bearing to
>>finish a rallye.
>>    
>>
>
>For those who have never had the pleasure ... bacon rind effectively is
>leather !  Poorly cured, but ...
>
>And, back then, it was not all that uncommon to stuff in a piece of leather
>as a temporary replacement for worn-out babbitt.  Engines turned much slower
>and made much less power (Model T produced something like 20 hp from a 2.9
>liter engine at a racy 1600 rpm), so bearing loads were a great deal less
>than even our 1950's design engines.
>
>Plus remember this was the Great Depression in the US, so "making do with
>what you had" sometimes meant the difference between eating or going hungry
>...
>
>Randall





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>