[Fot] So a question?

[Steven Preiss]

JACK
THANKS FOR THE "CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE TYPE OF FRONT SPOILER SVRA HOLDS
ACCEPTABLE. THAT IS WHAT I AM IN THE PLANNING STAGES OF PRODUCING. I WANT TO
USE IT ON THE TR3, HOWEVER. ANY PROBLEM WITH THIS?
STEVE P.

----- Original Message -----
  From: jwoesvra at aol.com
  To: spreiss at verizon.net ; kaskas at cox.net ; dave at microworks.net ;
fot at autox.team.net
  Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:18 AM
  Subject: Re: [Fot] So a question?


 What
about fared plexi windscreens allowed by SVRA? Are they any less out of
character from the original look than the dams?

I have been away for a week but y'all may have already finished this
conversation. I have said it many times before but perhaps not on the TR
list.....it is all about appearance.The Perspex windscreen (read Lexan) is a
nice safety upgrade that does not detract from the appearance of the car. The
period rules allowed windshield removal and required a racing windscreen. I
don't even understand your statement.I can't for the life of me understand why
you guys want to hang these air dams on your cars and then argue about
"period" or "non-period" appearance.
Look at the old pictures and replicate what the real racers did in "the day".
Don't come up with crap that didn't happen and try to justify a reason for it.
Get your noses out of the "boy racer" catalogs and try to get in the spirit of
what we do. Why can't you make a spoiler that replicates what the guys like
Kas and Bob Tullius used? Why do you have to buy a POS fiberglass AIRDAM? I
fight this battle all the time. If you want the modern look and think that is
KOOL, SCCA or NASA will be happy to take your money.Jack WoehrleSVRA


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
  Supercharge your AIM. Get the AIM toolbar for your browser.