SC Conference Call(s): - [JONAT] Assistant Sector Coordinators List Update
Mark Stephenson
jonat@autox.team.net
Fri Nov 21 22:45:01 2003
Along the same lines, you can save a chat and forward that. It's a lot
easier than keeping minutes and typing them out.
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jonat-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:jonat-admin@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Brad Preiss
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:08 PM
> To: jonat@autox.team.net
> Subject: RE: SC Conference Call(s): - [JONAT] Assistant
> Sector Coordinators List Update
>
> Great feedback on all of this -
>
> I was bringing up the conference call idea as a way to keep
> communications
> open for all of us (which is always good).
>
> I agree that only two or three sectors at a time is most
> reasonable - Too
> large a group for a con call with all of us.
>
> ( The 1-800 # I was referring to was what they call a
> "bridge" where as we
> could call into a single 1-800 number and be "bridged"
> together on one call
> with using number - very useful for large spread out groups
> such as this)
>
> The "net chat" idea can be easily accommodated via simple
> Instant Messenger
> chat room - ( most people have an AOL IM address - if not, it
> is free to
> download and you do not have to be a member of AOL to have it ).
>
> To keep continuity as mentioned - a simple "minutes" of any
> issues that
> arise during the call could be forwarded to Bob or Jamie and
> then combined
> at that level then disseminated later.
>
> Brad
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jonat-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:jonat-admin@autox.team.net]On
> Behalf Of Jamie - JONAT
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:50 AM
> To: jonat@autox.team.net
> Subject: SC Conference Call(s): - [JONAT] Assistant Sector
> Coordinators
> List Update
>
>
> I agree with the value of tying in with nearby SCs. I
> suppose three on
> either side is good, but I would think two would suffice if
> we have a bit of
> a schedule problem with SC availability.
>
> I also like the Chat option Mark brought up too. Somewhat
> because of it's
> cost parameter and although I really haven't used any Chat
> line too much,
> the little I have they seemed to be fairly instantaneous. We
> may suffer
> from lack of emotion though as most computing communications
> seem to. I
> might mention that when we had our first "inter-Sector"
> meeting last year in
> BC, it seemed to me to take a few minutes for everyone to
> feel comfortable
> enough to open up and let the ideas or questions flow. Maybe that's a
> "human trait" but do we want to pay for phone time while
> everyone is "making
> nice"?
>
> Okay, forget that concern, I'm just getting overwhelmed around here in
> business & personal life and have a little stress going on.
> But although I
> just explained it, I'm still leaving that comment in this
> email to show I
> have the concern and perhaps we need to keep some watered
> down version of it
> in mind. Perhaps if we could collect some basic questions to
> get a quick
> start with, we can dive right in when we connect up.
>
> I noticed Trey said later the better (essentially), that
> probably works for
> a few of us. And if we stay within our two-three Sector
> limit, it shouldn't
> be too hard to schedule it so it's good for all. The only
> problem I can
> dream up right now is the continuation of an overall JONAT
> communication
> incongruence. What I mean is there will not be a "single
> person" (at least)
> who will have heard all conversations and therefore maybe be
> able to further
> explain some point brought up if required at a later time, to
> a different
> SC, in a timely manner.
>
> So that brings us back to ALL or perhaps Bob & I being on the
> line for all
> calls.
>
> Someone also mentioned something about somehow conferencing
> with relation to
> an 800 number? Remember, JONAT has an 800 number currently.
> Can it be used
> someway?
>
> Hmmm ...
>
> Jamie
>
> Jamie & Dru - Everett, WA
> 88 Series III V12 VdP - Roxanne
> 89 XJS V12 Convertible - Butch
> Jaguar Owner's North American Tour - http://jonat.org
> April 15, 2004 - July 4, 2004
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark McDavid" <mcdavid@britishparts.com>
> To: <jonat@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:25 AM
> Subject: RE: [JONAT] Assistant Sector Coordinators List Update
>
>
> > I agree that a conference call would be useful and that the
> call should be
> > limited to nearby sectors.
> >
> > Mark McDavid
> > Marketing Director
> > Motorcars LTD/British Parts International
> > http://www.motorcarsltd.com
> > http://www.britishparts.com
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ian Bailey [SMTP:ibailey@cbnsystem.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 9:02 PM
> > > To: jonat@autox.team.net
> > > Subject: Re: [JONAT] Assistant Sector Coordinators List Update
> > >
> > > It may be useful I think but only for a few sectors at a
> time. There
> would
> > > be too many people to talk to at one time; however, I
> would like to
> talk
> > > to say 3 sectors in front and 3 behind me.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Bob <mailto:engl@accesscomm.ca>
> > > To: jonat@autox.team.net <mailto:jonat@autox.team.net>
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:55 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [JONAT] Assistant Sector Coordinators List Update
> > >
> > > The idea of a conference call might have some merit.
> What do some of
> you
> > > other SC's think of this?
> > >
> > >
> > > Bob
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: jonat-admin@autox.team.net
> <mailto:jonat-admin@autox.team.net>
> > > [mailto:jonat-admin@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Brad Preiss
> > > Sent: November 20, 2003 12:59 AM
> > > To: jonat@autox.team.net <mailto:jonat@autox.team.net>
> > > Subject: RE: [JONAT] Assistant Sector Coordinators List Update
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It's just getting another set of "new eyeballs " on stuff
> - but thanks,
> > > what you guys have done to date is again, very impressive!!
> > >
> > > Now let's let the rest of the "Jag world" know what we're
> up too - love
> to
> > > make this a huge event and get some real press on this -
> that would be
> > > FUN!
> > >
> > > Ok,
> > >
> > > Any way to simply get the current registration numbers -
> the other SC's
> > > must need these for reservations ect. ( my wife's first
> question - of
> > > course )
> > >
> > > Not to make any waves - but I think in the near future a real time
> > > conference call for all SC's and you would be in
> order....get everyone
> on
> > > the "same page"
> > > your in charge, so go as you may - but it has been my
> experience that
> > > teams get more vocal when there are "live" people on the
> line - meaning
> > > that questions they reserve and keep to themselves are
> put out on the
> > > table when sometimes via e-mail they are not brought up (
> unless it is
> an
> > > emergency). Maybe if you give an overall status of the
> tour, then a
> quick
> > > 1 minute update from each SC - then open forum...
> > >
> > > I may be able to set this up free of charge - using my "old" MCI
> contacts
> > > and a 1-800 number ( no guarantees on this - but I may be
> able to call
> in
> > > a favor )..... just let me know if this is something you
> think would be
> in
> > > order...as the start date move closer - it is something you should
> > > consider if even for only one call.
> > >
> > > Again, I am just throwing out new ideas and concepts - I
> hope I am not
> > > sounding like a "problem child" because I really am not - ...no
> really....
> > > I'm not...lol
> > >
> > > Trouble maker...Brad
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > JAGUAR OWNER'S NORTH AMERICAN TOUR mailing list
> > REPLY TO : JONAT@autox.team.net
> > www.jonat.org
> > _______________________________________________
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JAGUAR OWNER'S NORTH AMERICAN TOUR mailing list
> REPLY TO : JONAT@autox.team.net
> www.jonat.org
> _______________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> JAGUAR OWNER'S NORTH AMERICAN TOUR mailing list
> REPLY TO : JONAT@autox.team.net
> www.jonat.org
> _______________________________________________
>