[Shotimes] Re: Fiero (was Cooling Issues???????)

[Ron Nottingham]

No, not forgetting.  The MR2 Mk2 was a totally different animal to me.
Almost supercar league with the turbo.  The NA's were nice, but seemed
either too underpowered or too overweight, and felt more soft.  The Mk2 just
doesn't seem to fit in with the 70s-80s mid-engine cars.

Ron N. - Dalton, GA
90 SHO

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Kegel" <d.kegel@attbi.com>


> Ron,
>
> Are you forgetting about the 2nd Gen Turbo MR2.  Those had plenty of
oomph.
>
> Dave Kegel
> ----- Original Message ----- >
>
> > Engine:
> > MR2: needed more "oomph", more like a 2.0L engine, not a supercharger
> > Fiero: needed a nice, light weight 4-cylinder with "oomph", like an all
> > alloy Quad-4 HO
> > X1/9: needed allot more "oomph", an all alloy 2.0L 16V would have been
> nice
> > 914: was perfect with the 6, and still great with the 2.0L