SHO RESPONSES ONLY PLEASE was RE: [Shotimes] Re: Fiero's ad nauseum

[Ron Porter]

Just one deer with the '89, at 3:30 AM Christmas morning. Luckily, it was
only the LF headlight, a fixable corner of the hood, and the LF fender. Car
was drivable. Woke me up, though.

A year later, after all of the bodywork and fresh paint, I killed a
telephone pole!

Tried to kill a tree with the '99, but the tree won!

Ron Porter

-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
[mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Timothy Tyner
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 9:30 PM
To: shotimes@autox.team.net
Subject: SHO RESPONSES ONLY PLEASE was RE: [Shotimes] Re: Fiero's ad
nauseum


Here is a new topic that is about SHO's.  What have you killed with your SHO
s, and waht damage did it do?  I will start with my oldest SHO the 89.
Killed an owl with it.  Cracked my headlight and put a nice dent in the hood
( the bra covers a lot).  90 - killed a freakin COW!  Poor Bessie did not
stand a chance vs all 220 horses stampeding her arse!  Insurance totaled the
vehicle, but it only dented the hood and fender and A-pillar.  Scratched the
passenger door glass too.  Oh yeah, it burst my windshield into 734,567,902
pieces, all of which ended up in the hardest to reach places of my interior.
 95 - killed an opossum or three, and a deer.  Opossum's did nothing but
dent my exhaust, but the deer cracked my mirror and dented the fenders a
little.  The deer I hit with my bro's 01 F150 did a little more damage as it
was head on (whoops, forgot about the SHO ONLY request I made:D)

-------Original Message-------

From: Ron Porter
Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 5:30:38 PM
To: Alan Fanning; SHOtimes
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Re: Fiero's ad nauseum

Frankly, if you look at the posts for the last few days, the SHO-specific
posts are on the very thin side.

I have found these off-topic discussions to be rather interesting. They are
much like when a group of SHO folks get together in person, the topics are
not anywhere near totally SHO specific.

As Dave Kegel mentioned in a post this last week (which no one publicly
responded to), SHO-only topics are getting a bit boring, as there isn't a
lot new under the sun for folks that have been here awhile. Any other
interesting topics we can discuss is fine with me.

Ron Porter

-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
[mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Alan Fanning
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 5:11 PM
To: SHOtimes
Subject: [Shotimes] Re: Fiero's ad nauseum


Can we drop it now or move it off line? It's a Taurus SHO list, guys!

Alan

> The real 85 Pace Car had a cool 2.7L Quad 4 (GM's first public use of the
> engine, and they wanted to show it off). The replica Pace Cars had either
> the 2.5L (non)Tech-4 which wheezed 92hp or the 3.0L V6, which was a
> destroked 3.8L V6, and was probably over rated at 125hp. Those early
3.0L's
> weren't very good
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
.

[demime 0.99d.1 removed an attachment of type image/gif]
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes