[Shotimes] Re:96 Brake Upgrade,was Annie goes solo too before becoming Cheating

[Dave Kegel]

Ian was just correcting someone else.  Someone mentioned about being allowed
to back-date parts, and Ian pointed out that the '96 SHO brakes are not a
back-date.  They would be an update as it came out later, not earlier.

Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Chapin" <pchapin@houston.rr.com>
To: "Dave Kegel" <d.kegel@comcast.net>; "SHOtimes" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: August 07, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re:96 Brake Upgrade,was Annie goes solo too before
becoming Cheating


> "Well, the 96 brakes wouldnt be a backdate...
>
> Ian"
>
> The above statement is the one I was responding to. It sounds to me like
Ian
> believes the 96 brakes to be a Taurus update, legal in ESP if both
vehicles
> are on the same line in Appendix A (Street Prepared) and all SHO's are on
> the same line. Problem is the upgrade is not a 96 SHO upgrade, so it does
> matter. It is illegal because the upgrade is from a  95 Continental, a car
> not on the same line in Appendix A.
>
> Is that any better?
>
> Paul