[Shotimes] Re:96 Brake Upgrade,was Annie goes solo too before becoming Cheating

[Ron Porter]

I'm sorry, but I subscribe to the Smoky Yunick school of racing.

If I can get away will illegal s**t, I will.

If you want to be an honorable person and stay absolutely legal, Good For
You!!.................and I hope you like getting your ass beat every week!!

Anyone who wins their class in any racing series is doing something that
"stretches" the rules.

If you don't believe that, you are a gullible a-hole.

Ron Porter 

-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Dave Kegel
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:52 PM
To: Paul Chapin; SHOtimes
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re:96 Brake Upgrade,was Annie goes solo too before
becoming Cheating


Ian was just correcting someone else.  Someone mentioned about being allowed
to back-date parts, and Ian pointed out that the '96 SHO brakes are not a
back-date.  They would be an update as it came out later, not earlier.

Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Chapin" <pchapin@houston.rr.com>
To: "Dave Kegel" <d.kegel@comcast.net>; "SHOtimes" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: August 07, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re:96 Brake Upgrade,was Annie goes solo too before
becoming Cheating


> "Well, the 96 brakes wouldnt be a backdate...
>
> Ian"
>
> The above statement is the one I was responding to. It sounds to me like
Ian
> believes the 96 brakes to be a Taurus update, legal in ESP if both
vehicles
> are on the same line in Appendix A (Street Prepared) and all SHO's are on
> the same line. Problem is the upgrade is not a 96 SHO upgrade, so it does
> matter. It is illegal because the upgrade is from a  95 Continental, a car
> not on the same line in Appendix A.
>
> Is that any better?
>
> Paul
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes