[Shotimes] Re:96 Brake Upgrade,was Annie goes solo too before becoming Cheating

[Paul Chapin]

That is what I thought I said :) he believes them to be an update when in
fact they are not an SHO update but rather a conversion to brakes from a
totally different car. If they were an update they would be legal in ESP.
Am I getting further lost? The drugs are pretty well worn off, at least the
pain is back pretty good:(
Paul

> Ian was just correcting someone else.  Someone mentioned about being
allowed
> to back-date parts, and Ian pointed out that the '96 SHO brakes are not a
> back-date.  They would be an update as it came out later, not earlier.
>
> Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Chapin" <pchapin@houston.rr.com>
> To: "Dave Kegel" <d.kegel@comcast.net>; "SHOtimes"
<shotimes@autox.team.net>
> Sent: August 07, 2003 5:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re:96 Brake Upgrade,was Annie goes solo too before
> becoming Cheating
>
>
> > "Well, the 96 brakes wouldnt be a backdate...
> >
> > Ian"
> >
> > The above statement is the one I was responding to. It sounds to me like
> Ian
> > believes the 96 brakes to be a Taurus update, legal in ESP if both
> vehicles
> > are on the same line in Appendix A (Street Prepared) and all SHO's are
on
> > the same line. Problem is the upgrade is not a 96 SHO upgrade, so it
does
> > matter. It is illegal because the upgrade is from a  95 Continental, a
car
> > not on the same line in Appendix A.
> >
> > Is that any better?
> >
> > Paul