[Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting the intake)

John Weidenbenner johnjweid@earthlink.net
Sun, 10 Aug 2003 11:36:50 -0500


It's common practice. I've even seen Ford do it!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim and Debbie Leyden" <jndleyden@mindspring.com>
To: "'SHOtimes'" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 6:26 PM
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting the
intake)


> Although I can't speak for other manufacturers, I can attest to the fact
> that new Chevrolet engines are only run about 1 minute before being
stuffed
> into a car.  There is no break-in running.  After the engine comes off the
> assembly line it is put on a running stand on a carousel, all of the
> electrical and cooling are hooked up.  There is a computer monitor at each
> stand and the motor is cranked while the ignition timing is set.  As soon
as
> the motor starts and it is confirmed that it runs correctly it is shut
down
> and taken off the carousel and put into a crate for shipment to the
assembly
> line.  That is the extent of the engines break in until the finished car
is
> driven off the line.  If the engine doesn't start on the first trip around
> the carousel they let it go around one more time trying to figure out why.
> If it hasn't started at the end of the second revolution the motor is
taken
> off to be dismantled to find out why.
>
> I'm sure every manufacturer does pretty much the same thing.
>
> Jim
> '93 MTX
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of John Weidenbenner
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 7:07 PM
> To: Ron Porter; 'SHOtimes'
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting
> the intake)
>
>
> If improved ring sealing really does happen with this procedure then the
> auto manufactures should be able to devise an at the factory procedure
that
> will provide the same results. The improved performance, i.e. better
> compression or whatever, should also boost fuel mileage and lower
emissions.
> I can't beileve that the manufacturers would not take advantage of that!
>
> John W.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@prodigy.net>
> To: "'John Weidenbenner'" <johnjweid@earthlink.net>; "'SHOtimes'"
> <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 10:45 AM
> Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting
the
> intake)
>
>
> Too many variables for owners to follow, and it encourages driving that is
> not the "norm", hence liability issues. Also, I doubt they really care
> whether someone gets the last few HP out of their engine, since most of
the
> driving population never gets beyond 1/2 throttle, anyway.
>
> Ron Porter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of John Weidenbenner
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 11:04 AM
> To: SHOtimes
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting
the
> intake)
>
>
> It's in the message below.
>
> I wonder why the auto manufactures do not recommend this simple secret to
> ring
> sealing?
>
> John W.
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: John Weidenbenner
>   To: Ron Childs ; Chris Zap ; SHOtimes
>   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:45 PM
>   Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting
> the
> intake)
>
>
>   I don't understand what those photos mean? A scientific report, not an
> infomercial. Isn't he trying to sell a magazine?
>
>   John W.
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: Ron Childs
>     To: John Weidenbenner ; Chris Zap ; SHOtimes
>     Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:30 AM
>     Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS:
Interesting...porting
> the intake)
>
>
>     They presented pictures of pistons/rings that were treated equally
> except
> for the different break-in methods. What kind of proof would you be
looking
> for?
>
>     -Ron Childs
>
>
>     John Weidenbenner <johnjweid@earthlink.net> wrote:
>       The motortune guy offers no proof of his theory. I consider it only
an
>       opioion without any scientific proof. The atricle is worthless.
>
>       John W.
>
>       ----- Original Message -----
>       From: "Chris "Zap""
>
>
>       > http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm
>       >
>       > Saw this a while ago.... very interesting article on break in for
> engines
>       of
>       > all kinds!
>       >
>       > ~Chris
>       > ----- Original Message -----
>       > From: "John Weidenbenner"
>       >
>       > > What difference does that make? Looser bearings? More or less
>       > > sealing/friction of the piston rings? "Bedding" in the engine
> block
>       (like
>       > > making the brakes work "better")?
>       > >
>       > > John W.
>       > > ----- Original Message -----
>       > > From: "Paul Nimz"
>       > >
>       > > > I think it is in how the motor is broke in.
>       > > >
>       > > > Paul Nimz
>       > > _______________________________________________
>       _______________________________________________
>       Shotimes mailing list
>       Shotimes@autox.team.net
>       http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes