[Shotimes] Re:MAF

[Ron Porter]

I don't know of every 73mm out there, but I personally only know of one
person who has had great luck with the 73mm.

As an example, and I didn't check prices from everybody: Performance Plus
gets $169 for the 73mm MAF, folks here have said that the Pro-M calibrated
75mm is $180.

To me, there is NO reason to look at the 73mm any longer.

Back in the "old days", the 73mm was the cheap alternative to the Pro-M
77mm, then a few years later, it was still cheaper than the 80mm/LPM combo.
 
When a drop-in 75mm works like a champ for about everybody who has one, it
appears to be a no-brainer for a bolt-on-mod SHO.

Ron Porter 


-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of louis grande
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 7:04 PM
To: shotimes@autox.team.net
Subject: [Shotimes] Re:MAF


Doesn't the 19lb sample tube run correctly on the SHO because the Mustang
uses a total of 8 injectors while the sho uses higher flowing 6? Thereby
having similar fuel dispersal totals? I always thought the larger sample
tube wasn't tuned properly to the fuel consumption.


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes