[Shotimes] MAF connector question

[Alan Fanning]

Several of us on TechSHO have been collecting flow test data on various
MAF's used on the SHO. From these tests one gets pressure drop of the MAF vs
mass or volumetric flow rate of air. At 300cfm (stock SHO at 7000 rpm) the
difference in pressure drop between a fully stock setup and an 80mm Pro-M
MAF with cone filter is equivalent to about 2-1/2% of rated hp (i.e., 5-6
hp). So it does buy something to go to a larger MAF, but it's not huge. BTW,
a 75mm Pro-M has identical pressure drop to an 80mm Ford MAF and doesn't
require an LPM.

    Alan

> Thanks for the info Carl,  I'll read up on that.  I'm still an SHO
> noob.  I
> wonder though, why an 80mm MAF for a 3.2L or 3.0L 6 cyl?  Guys run 9's
> on
> 80mm MAFs on a 5.0L revving to 7,000 rpm.  Is it worth the hassle for
> something that won't yield more performance then a 73mm or 77mm?
> What's the
> most horse power someone is making with a SHO?  I just can't imagine a
> need
> for this application.
> 
> Jonathan Zane KC2ENA