[Shotimes] 80mm MAF failure, ~$price? (HELP)

Kevin & Cheryl Airth clubairth@peoplepc.com
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:23:34 -0600


I run a stock 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII 80mm MAF with my stock SHO air box. I
had to turn the MAF 90 degrees to get it to fit. Works great but I have been
told that the MAF orientation is critical and that rotating it can throw
things off? More stealth too for the SCCA under hood safety inspections!!
.
.



> Memory is hazy here, but one of the 80mm MAFs out there has a straight
> housing like the stock 55mm, and if that step-down ring is removed, it
woks
> on the stock airbox.
>
> FWIW, I have the conical and the SS Can on mine, but the problem I see
with
> the K&N conical is that you need a Can or some other setup to get cold air
> from the fenderwell. Given my druthers, a stock airbox with a K&N panel
> should work just fine if it can still be used.
>
> Ron Porter
>
>
> The 80mm is just like the 77mm, it has a "velocity stack" that is part
> of the MAF body, and is what the cone filter bolts too.  There is no way
> to remove it to get it to fit the stock airbox.  Also the 80mm is
> plastic, which should help with heat soak, whereas the 75 is metal, as
> well as the 77.
>
> Bill Murray
>
>
> 75mm fits the stock airbox, IIRC, and the 80mm needs another filter.
>
> Although I recall someone removing the step-down ring from a stock
> airbox
> and the 80mm fits it......
>
> Go with the 75mm. The sizes are not an airflow, but a level of airflow
> metering precision. The 75mm is fine, and there is not any advantage to
> the
> bigger MAF on an n/a SHO.
>
> Ron Porter
>
> -----