Fw: RE: RE: RE: [Shotimes] RE: supercharging

[David P]

That's the '85MTX. The ATX's went TBI in '83, IIRC. I know the '84s were.


David P

95MTX



~
----- Original Message -----
From: <IdriveaSHO@aol.com>
To: <BJamesjr@aol.com>; <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 01:22
Subject: Re: Fw: RE: RE: RE: [Shotimes] RE: supercharging


> Actually, to let a "secret" out of the bag....SS's and Z28's dyno the same
> #'s within about 5hp. Yes I've seen this, more than a few different of
each,
> and also the same things on different days. Wether or not the SS is even
5hp
> higher or just the car running a little cooler(intake) than the standards,
> not really much of a big deal though. For the extra dough I'd skip the SS,
> buy a Z28 and put a 12 bolt rear end in with some better gears since the
10
> bolt rear is VERY notorious for breaking under stock power levels. As for
a
> mustang, the fox body(1979-1993) is the best bang for your buck.
Personally I
> wouldn't go any older than '85 though. '85 is carburated and you can do
any
> number of fast things to it. 87+ is EFI, 88CA only and 89+ are Mass air.
> These are THE cheapest cars to make fast, cheaper than small block chevy
> whatevers, cheaper than brand x cars, the absolute cheapest. They're even
> cheaper when you buy one that someone spent $20k on and can only sell for
$8k
> car included =)   Good luck -Steve "had two mustangs and I'm in a Z28/TA
> club" Bowen
> << inexpensive
>  performance I would look at used Mustangs or Camaro SS's >>
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes