[Shotimes] Re: Rookie Significant Others was: Convention Track event - AWA group

[ianf@eden.rutgers.edu]

Yeah, but I still don't see the logic behind the idea. What is the 
diffeence between a male driver without track experience and a female 
without track experience? Seriously (no jokes). Legally, it could be a 
nightmare. 

sorry for the typos (no spell check at work and no time to check)

Ian


> Ian, if we have a "ladies" class as Don describes, my Therese would 
go out, with me in the passenger seat as
> tutor.  She'll be terrified but she'll have a blast.
> 
> But Ian has a point.  Don, if you have a "Ladies Only" class, you 
could get sued!  A lawsuit is pending in Wisconsin against the
> "Curves for Women" fitness-center chain.  Seems Wisconsin's anti-
discrimination law forbids any exclusion in public accomodations by
> gender.  The State Assembly is considering a bill that would create a 
loophole so that female-only fitness centers (read: Curves)
> would be legal.  So Don, maybe we should be PC and call it "rookie 
significant others" class.  :-)
> 
> Joseph van Oss
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> Why are males and females seperate this year? I am confused..
> Ian
> 
> > Yes Mark, I have on the registration form, a lower price for
> > the "ladies" class.  Pure novice only, ladies with
> > experience (like Terry) and some others should go in the
> > regular classes.