[Shotimes] slow sho, just driver?
DTNesbit@FTC-I.net
DTNesbit@FTC-I.net
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:54:15 -0500
I ran 15.2 at Mason-Dixon during the convention. It was my first every run
on a dragstrip with my SHO or any other vehicle. I think that time could be
improved. My reaction time was terrible.
David
94ATX&91
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Fisher" <ianf@eden.rutgers.edu>
To: "'Michael Tulloch'" <teach200513760@yahoo.com>;
<shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 9:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] slow sho, just driver?
> A stock SHO runs a best of low 16's? Maybe at 3000 feet in the Rocky
> Mountains. I ran a 16.1 the first time I ever drag raced my mtx because
> I had no idea what I was doing. I am currently in the high 14's low 15's
> range and I don't have enough mods to have knocked a full second off of
> my times.
>
> Ian
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Michael Tulloch
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 9:47 PM
> To: shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] slow sho, just driver?
>
>
> I don't know how you could say a SHO will stomp any
> Stock SE-R since both the old 91-94 and new 02+ SE-R
> run both run the quarter in the low 15's. At best a
> stock SHO any year runs at best low 16's/high 15's.
> With the new SE-R's having the 2.5 the torque comes on
> much lower so I wouldn't discredit the new SE-R's or
> SE. Michael.
> --- shotimes-request@autox.team.net wrote:
> > Send Shotimes mailing list submissions to
> > shotimes@autox.team.net
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> > visit
> > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> > 'help' to
> > shotimes-request@autox.team.net
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> > is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Shotimes digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: slow sho, just driver? (Paul L Fisher)
> > 2. Re: Interchangeable PCM ? (Paul L Fisher)
> > 3. Re: Special Oil (Paul L Fisher)
> > 4. Re: Special Oil (Epperly)
> > 5. Re: LPM (Justin Schick)
> > 6. (no subject) (Anthony Faye)
> > 7. Re: OT: Bucs vs Eagles - Do you think the Bucs
> > can
> > get to the big dance? (George Fourchy)
> > 8. RE: (no subject) (Ian Fisher)
> > 9. RE: OT: Bucs vs Eagles - Do you think the Bucs
> > can
> > get to the big dance? (Ian Fisher)
> > 10. How to test PCM (KICKINSHO@aol.com)
> > 11. RE: How to test PCM (Ian Fisher)
> > 12. Re: OT: Bucs vs Eagles - Do you think the Bucs
> > can
> > get to the big dance? (Ron Nottingham)
> > 13. Re: OT: Bucs vs Eagles - Do you think the Bucs
> > can
> > get to the big dance? (Erik Balser)
> > 14. Seattle SHO mechanic (Kirk Jorgenson)
> > 15. RE: Special Oil (Kirk Doucette)
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 1
> > From: "Paul L Fisher" <sho@paul-fisher.com>
> > To: "Josh Salaets" <jsalaets@msn.com>,
> > "Shotimes@Autox. Team. Net"
> > <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Shotimes] slow sho, just driver?
> > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:29:23 -0600
> >
> > 175 HP, not 170 HP.
> >
> > Paul L Fisher
> > '93 Ford Taurus SHO Crimson Clearcoat ATX 169K Build
> > date 11/18/1992
> > - K&N Panel filter, Tokico Struts, Eibach Springs,
> > Dynomax cat-back, Holley
> > 190lph fuel pump, FPS rebuilt ATX, 26mm rear sway
> > bar, Performance-Plus
> > Stainless Steel Y-pipe, Delrin sub-frame bushings,
> > Amsoil Series 2000 0W-30
> > oil, Amsoil Synthetic ATF.
> > '00 Ford Explorer XLT 5.0L V8 AWD Oxford White
> > Clearcoat 39K Build date
> > 11/19/1999
> > - Amsoil Series 2000 0W-30 oil, K&N Fuel Injection Performance Kit
> >
> > SHO Club member http://www.shoclub.com/
> > Check out my web site http://www.paul-fisher.com/
> > Amsoil dealer http://www.paul-fisher.com/oil.htm
> >
> > Get $5 free from Paypal!
> > https://www.paypal.com/refer/pal=P3XEFFBFUFKN6
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Josh Salaets" <jsalaets@msn.com>
> > To: "Ron DeReus" <dereus@fbx.com>; "Shotimes@Autox.
> > Team. Net"
> > <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 10:33 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Shotimes] slow sho, just driver?
> >
> >
> > > > At the risk of totally embarassing myself, I
> > have to ask... I was
> > > following
> > > > a newer Sentra and we did a 2nd gear, rolling
> > 20-70mph on-ramp
> > competition
> > > > and it was basically a dead heat, he may have
> > pulled me a little, but I
> > > > definitely wasn't catching him. I'm not Mario
> > Andretti or Mark
> > Nunnally,
> > > > and I only pulled 5000rpm and shifted, but is
> > the new Sentra pretty
> > quick,
> > > > or is my SHO weak? (mechanically or humanly)
> > >
> > > Whether or not a Sentra is considered "powerful"
> > GREATLY depends on the
> > type
> > > and year of the car. I had a '91 Sentra SE-R that
> > was a lot of fun to
> > drive
> > > and had quite a bit of pep, but nothing compared
> > to my SHO. The SE-R
> > > version of the Sentra started in '91 with an
> > excellent, bulletproof, 140
> > hp,
> > > 2.0 liter engine, but gained a lot of weight and
> > lost horsepower through
> > the
> > > years.
> > >
> > > The new SE-R V-Spec has a new 2.5 liter engine
> > that has 170 horses and is
> > > pretty quick, but still shouldn't be a match for
> > the SHO. You're biggest
> > > problem was shifting at 5K - not only were you
> > never reaching peak
> > > horsepower, but you also shifted out of the power
> > band at every shift.
> > Try
> > > revving it out next time to at least 6500, and
> > you'll leave ANY stock SE-R
> > > in the dust. Besides, it's a lot of fun to hear
> > the SHO motor at 6500,
> > and
> > > it sure won't hurt it! ; )
> > >
> > > Josh Salaets
> > > 95 SHO MTX (I SHO U)
> > > 85 Omni GLH-T (Yeah, it's fast)
> > > NWSHOC Member
> > > Eugene, OR
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Shotimes mailing list
> > > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 2
> > From: "Paul L Fisher" <sho@paul-fisher.com>
> > To: <KICKINSHO@aol.com>, <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Interchangeable PCM ?
> > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:35:01 -0600
> >
> > No. The ATX PCM has additional signals to control
> > the ATX.
> >
> > Paul L Fisher
> > '93 Ford Taurus SHO Crimson Clearcoat ATX 169K Build
> > date 11/18/1992
> > - K&N Panel filter, Tokico Struts, Eibach Springs,
> > Dynomax cat-back, Holley
> > 190lph fuel pump, FPS rebuilt ATX, 26mm rear sway
> > bar, Performance-Plus
> > Stainless Steel Y-pipe, Delrin sub-frame bushings,
> > Amsoil Series 2000 0W-30
> > oil, Amsoil Synthetic ATF.
> > '00 Ford Explorer XLT 5.0L V8 AWD Oxford White
> > Clearcoat 39K Build date
> > 11/19/1999
> > - Amsoil Series 2000 0W-30 oil, K&N Fuel Injection Performance Kit
> >
> > SHO Club member http://www.shoclub.com/
> > Check out my web site http://www.paul-fisher.com/
> > Amsoil dealer http://www.paul-fisher.com/oil.htm
> >
> > Get $5 free from Paypal!
> > https://www.paypal.com/refer/pal=P3XEFFBFUFKN6
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <KICKINSHO@aol.com>
> > To: <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 1:42 PM
> > Subject: [Shotimes] Interchangeable PCM ?
> >
> >
> > > Quick question
> > >
> > > Are the PCM's for the '91 and '93 interchangeable?
> > The '91 is a MTX and
> > the
> > > '93 is an ATX.
> > >
> > > We are trying to figure out if the PCM in my '93
> > is on it's way out.
> > >
> > > TIA !
> > >
> > > Kris
> > > '91+ White
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes