[Shotimes] 96+ PFCM brake pads

[James F. Ryan III]

I had '96 slotted rotors when I used the 598 Ford pads - maybe that
contributed to them being dusty.  When I switched to the PFCM pads I went
with non-slotted rotors and they were dusty!!  Now I'm very happy with my
Carbotechs Fs and non-slotted rotors.

Jim Ryan
FINALLY HOME!!!!!!!!
Wayne, NJ
91 Plus  all white/mocha with fiberglass hood, rod shifter, & rear spoiler

255 Lph fuel pump, SHO Shop can & horn, 80mm MAF, S&B cone filter, SHO Shop
HiFlow Y-pipe & cat-back exhaust, SHO Shop LPM, SHO Shop underdrive pulleys,
SHO Shop HiRevs Jr clutch & steel billet LiteWeight flywheel, reinforced
engine & trans mounts, SHO Shop TQ limiters, SHO NUT aluminum SFBs, FPS 96
SHO front brakes, Carbotech F brake pads, Nooks full-body SFCs, Koni adj
struts, SHO Shop linear springs, 24mm FSB, 26mm RSB, SHO Shop steel f&r
STBs, Bridgestone Potenza RE-730 225/55-16, CATZ MSP fog lights, police
grille



>-----Original Message-----
>From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
>[mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Mark Nunnally
>Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:23 PM
>To: shotimes
>Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 96+ PFCM brake pads
>
>
>> As far as dusting - Ford pads SUCK, PFCM pads SUCK, and the Carbotech F
>pads
>> I have now aren't dust-free but they are the lowest dusting and best
>> stopping street pads I've ever had.
>
>    The Ford OEM pads are the cleanest brake pad I've ever seen (and yes I
>ran white wheels on my 92 for awhile).  The PFCM dust a lot more than the
>Ford.
>
>You want dusty, you need to try a set of wilwoods "A" compound track pad.
>Actually I don't think it's brake dust, I think it's rotor dust they create
>:)  The rotors wear faster than the pads.  Holy Cow they stop though.
>
>mark
>_______________________________________________
>Shotimes mailing list
>Shotimes@autox.team.net
>http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes