[Shotimes] Gen 3 SHO's, I have to admit this...

[Paul Nimz]

My '97 has a '99 motor.  Definitely is better than the original motor.  But
I had the chance to break the '99 motor in like I drive and this was not the
case with my '97 motor.

Paul Nimz
'97 TR
'93 EG mtx



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Kegel" <d.kegel@attbi.com>
To: "'Paul Nimz'" <niks@dlogue.net>; "'Don McKinnon (AST)'"
<dmckinnon@asttechlabs.com>; <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 8:46 AM
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Gen 3 SHO's, I have to admit this...


> I thought I heard speculation that the '99s had stronger motors?
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Paul Nimz
> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 1:00 AM
> To: Don McKinnon (AST); shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Gen 3 SHO's, I have to admit this...
>
>
> If you get the tranny rebuilt be sure to get the torque converter done
> too. '96-97s are the best IMHO.  '98s have speedo problems and the '99
> is a stripped version.  Though it nay be the lightest, even though it is
> lacking in the suspension department.
>
> Paul Nimz
> '97 TR
> '93 EG mtx