[Shotimes] Replaced much of front end... still get**CRUNCH**

1badsho 1badsho@mail.tnh.net
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:50:38 -0500


kirk

u crack me up ! 

Ok .. i insulted your intelligence with the parts list .... 

All those who think kirk wouldnt sell a complete rod shifter pls stand up ( don looks .. but sees no one ! ) i NOW know kirk knows shifters! 

List ... this is a private joke between me and kirk !

Actually the hood is on my 91 every day driver.

Seriously thinking of putting the black cowl hood on the Sr 72 .... 

So either or .. u cant have it :p

dond



---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Kirk  Doucette" <Kirk.doucette@verizon.net>
Date:  Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:46:54 -0500

>Thief
>
>Hey still got the hood? Ill trade one of the rod shifters for it :)
>
>Kirk J Doucette
>NESHOC President
>Stormtrooper-97 White
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]On
>Behalf Of 1badsho
>Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:06 PM
>To: Neno Albert
>Cc: shotimes@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Replaced much of front end... still get**CRUNCH**
>
>neno
>
>bought a perfectly running sho .. ok condition .. but had the cinncy hood
>and police gril .. etc ... for $500 about 3 years ago when cars were
>fetching more money.
>
>He ran over a pot hole .. and the engine died.
>
>So he thought he  f **** his motor up.
>
>So i bought it ... since I had a buyer for the motor ( $500 ) and saw the
>dis cap was damaged .. :)
>
>Waited till i had the car on my trailer... went around the block ... pushed
>the connector back in .. and started right up!
>
>dond
>
>---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>From: Neno Albert <neno@sbcglobal.net>
>Date:  Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:52:34 -0800 (PST)
>
>>--- van Oss <vanOss@centurytel.net> wrote:
>>> I concur on checking the subframe bushings.
>>>
>>> A local pal with an 89 SHO was having starting problems.  Turns out the
>DIS
>>> was cracked by impact with the roll damper.  I know, you're thinking, how
>>> could that happen?  The DIS is not that close to the damper.  When we
>parked
>>> my 91 next to it, we noticed that his engine sat significantly lower than
>>> mine.  I'm embarrassed that it took us 20 minutes to figure it out.  His
>>> subframe bolts were shot (recall had not been done) and worse than that,
>>> they had backed out over an inch.  That car was a disaster waiting to
>>> happen.  It's lucky his DIS kept it off the road.  As it turned out, the
>>> local Ford dealer not only did the recall without question, but they also
>>> replaced the DIS free.  Wow.
>>>
>>> Joseph van Oss
>>
>>I had the EXACT same problem with my 91! The RR Subframe bolt snapped due
>to rusting and the
>>dampner cracked the DIS where you plug into it on the firewall side. Only
>problem was, Napleton
>>Lincoln/Mercury (friend worked there) promised me a new DIS, however this
>was at the time they
>>were not being produced.. Had to visit the local bone yard.
>>_______________________________________________
>>Shotimes mailing list
>>Shotimes@autox.team.net
>>http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
>_______________________________________________
>Shotimes mailing list
>Shotimes@autox.team.net
>http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes