[Shotimes] Brake Pads revisited

[DTNesbit@FTC-I.net]

I have them on my 91.  I have had them about a year now and I like them very
much.  I think the stop as well as or better than the stock pads.  They
don't squeal and are very low dust.  I ran the at Blackhawk Farms  this
year.
David
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leigh Smith" <leighsm@comcast.net>
To: "Jim and Debbie Leyden" <jndleyden@mindspring.com>
Cc: "Shotimes@Autox.Team.Net" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Brake Pads revisited


> I have been running the Raybestos Quiet Stop Ceramic pads only on the
> rear, for about a year now. No noise, no dust, shouldn't have heat
> issues. I have heard others say they are a little slippery (low friction
> coefficient) compared to the other hi-perf pads. I can't really comment
> on that since I don't have them on the front, I use the Porterfield R4S
> there. At least it's not enough to foul up my brake balance. The rear 94
> pads are just sooo small, I had to put something decent back there,
> better than stock.
>
> You might be the best one to comment:
>  Have you noticed it takes any more pedal pressure than before?
>
> Then get them hot, & see if it changes /fades (3 x  60-0 stops.)
> I'd like to hear what you find.
>
> Lee
>
>
> Jim and Debbie Leyden wrote:
>
> >I was just looking back over the SHOtimes pages on brakes and I noticed
that
> >there was no reference made to ceramic brake pads.
> >
> >Anyone have experience with these?
> >
> >Jim
> >'93 MTX
> >Just put on ceramics all the way around and haven't had time to form an
> >opinion yet.
> >_______________________________________________
> >Shotimes mailing list
> >Shotimes@autox.team.net
> >http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes