[Shotimes] 93 and 94 Differences

[Jonathan Zane KC2SHO]

Adam, I have bought 4 gen II SHO's in the last year. One is stripped and
mostly in my basement while the other 3 are all drivable.  I'm sure I'll
always have a least one.  I don't want to spend too much on upgrades though,
my SHO's are for daily driving and comfort.  Spanking the occasional import
always feels good in a sedan though.  I'd rather sink money into my stang
which can go way faster way cheaper.  Looking for an 11.00 ET this year.
Thanks for the input everyone.

Jonathan Zane KC2SHO
www.kc2sho.com

95 ATX Silver (my baby 90k ultra clean)
94 ATX White (Daily Driver)
93 ATX White (Not sure where this is going yet 85k)
93 ATX Green (parted out in my basement, 130k)

 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net 
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Adam Parrott
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 7:04 AM
> To: shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 93 and 94 Differences
> 
> 
> Don't forget the H3Z1, Steve (I'm running one in my '95 right 
> now).  ;)
> 
> FWIW, the H3Z factory program actually uses firmer line 
> pressure tables than the D4U1, making the D4U1 a little 
> "softer" in comparison.  The H3Z also sports slightly more 
> agressive spark tables and injector settings, which may 
> explain why some stock '93s are "faster" than their '94-'95 
> brothers.  I do feel that the upgraded chipsets which were 
> used in the bulk of the D4U1s are what set them apart from 
> the H3Zs and, in combination with the modified program, are 
> what actually make the upgrade worthwhile and noticeable.  
> It's not just about the "improved" line pressure tables.
> 
> Assuming you plan on keeping the car, Jonathan, then I would 
> second Steve's
> recommendation on the D4U1 and LPM combo.   Very nice upgrade, IMO.
> 
> Adam Parrott
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve Tatro" <stevetatro@netzero.com>
> To: <jonzane@kc2sho.com>
> Cc: <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 11:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 93 and 94 Differences
> 
> 
> Your info is a little mixed up.  The '93 came with the H3Z 
> (sometimes the H3Z2).  The '94 and '95 came with the D4U1, 
> which has, among other things, improved shifting characteristics.
> 
> I swapped my H3Z out for a D4U1 a couple of years ago.  I was 
> immediately impressed with the improved 1-2 shift.
> 
> After getting the D4U1, contact Ted Breaux regarding an LPM.  
> It's a nice addition to the upgrade computer.  FYI, Ted won't 
> make an LPM for the '93
> H3Z* computers.
> 
> Front brakes: '93 small, '94-'95 bigger, '96-'99 biggest.
> 
> If you want to see other difference from year to year, the 
www.shotimes.com FAQ is a great place to start!

Good luck,

Steve Tatro
Red/Black '93 with 175k miles
Monroe, Ohio

-- "Jonathan Zane KC2SHO" <jonzane@kc2sho.com> wrote:
Is there any difference between the 93 ATX and 94 ATX computer?  I know the
95 computer is supposed to have more positive shifting.  What other things
are different between 93 and 94?  Does the 94 still have the small brakes?

Jon



> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net 
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Zane 
> KC2SHO
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 10:17 AM
> To: shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: [Shotimes] Off Road SHO
>
>
> Not sure if he's on this list or not but a guy from the SHOforum sent 
> me some nice pictures of this awsome machine.  Enjoy.
>
http://www.njfourwheelers.com/pictures/off-road_SHO/


I'll take 2!


Jon Zane
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes