[Shotimes] Futura... was: If Ford Asked you ...
Donald Mallinson
dmall@mwonline.net
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:13:49 -0600
Carl,
the question was about other possible Futura's that were
better than the one mentioned, and the Falcon Futura was a
good car that was thought of well in the 60's and is sought
after by collectors today.
I agree that the name itself is dated, but in the 50's and
60's everything was about space (Rocket 88, tailfins) chrome
and excess. Excess on a small compact car sounds silly but
then there are the very expensive and excessive small cars
from Lexus, BMW, Mercedes, etc. They are no more outrageous
than the Futura Falcon was in 1964 (not sure how many years
they made that model, but I am pretty darn sure that 64 was
one of them).
Personally I don't think Ford should bring the name back,
because it is dated. Like Art Deco. Still those are neat
cars and draw a crowd at any cruise-in/show.
I assume, Carl, that you dislike other made-up-from-nothing
names like Lexus, Infinity, Acura, and a host of other
modern names. Names that sound like something but are pure
fiction and made up by people that are also too lazy to
think of a good name! :)
I have a little stuffed Bull in my 91 SHO and people all the
time are asking why...then I explain about "Taurus" and they
still have a blank stare, at least you and I and few hundred
other SHO (and SLO Taurus) fanatics know what it is all
about! ;)
Don Mallinson
Carl Prochilo wrote:
> I'm with Joe on this. Futura is not a name I want on my car. I'd
> be okay with Falcon; my uncle owned a plain Falcon in the 60s with a
> manual transmission and it didn't leave a big impression on me, just
> transportation. But Futura sounds like a word that someone made up
> because they were too lazy to think of a decent one. At least
> Taurus is "bull" in latin.