[Shotimes] Pontiac unveils SHO successor?

Shylo McKinsey mrfluffy02@yahoo.com
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:59:23 -0800 (PST)


LoL. I stopped reading the thread when it became "my
word against yours". Which if you go back to the
archives, that happened along time ago. 

Look, I didn't mean to start ANOTHER cockfight. For
that, I apologize. All I'm saying is that if an
"average driver" takes a FWD off the lot with
all-season tires (which most cars (FWD, RWD, AWD)
around here nowadays are coming with) and a RWD with
all-season tires, and drives it on unpleasant road
conditions, the FWD will probably (keyword probably)
handle better. YES, that's a "catch-all" statement,
possibly uninformed, but hey, in my 6 yrs on the road,
thats what I've seen. Not going to get into the age
factor: "your older so you've seen more" <G> Which is
probably true. ;-)

Not defending FWD, just giving my opinion, which in
this case is not-so-humble. But whatever. I honestly
wish I had an AWD Subie Legacy. They're nice cars, and
will handle ALOT better in crappy conditions, but for
now, I have a FWD with all-seasons, and thats just
fine with me. 

Call me stupid, call me a dumbass, hell, call me
Ishmael... I don't care ;-)

Shylo McKinsey

'91 White MTX

--- Ron Porter <ronporter@prodigy.net> wrote:

> Apparently Shylo has totally missed the point of the
> whole discussion.
> 
> When he makes the statement that he did, which
> indicates to me that he
> hasn't read any of this thread, then makes the
> uninformed statement about
> FWD which started this whole discussion in the first
> place, no, I can't let
> it go.
> 
> Why bitch about the thread when he obviously hasn't
> read anything that
> anyone has to say?
> 
> It's not that "I'm right", there are other
> experienced folks out here who
> have found the same thing over the years. They have
> weighed in on this
> thread both here and on the V8 list. And to make the
> blanket statement about
> FWD is being rather uninformed, especially followed
> by "we all know
> this"......no, we don't know this because it isn't
> true.
> 
> If FWD was so wonderful, why the move back to RWD
> and also AWD that
> enthusiasts and car mag writers have been wanting
> for many years? FWD is a
> cheap solution for cheap cars, and that's where it
> should have stayed.
> 
> Ron Porter



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com