[Shotimes] subframe connectors

[Leigh Smith]

VO the roll rate in the front is 31% stiffer on your 91 vs your 92 because
of the difference in the sway bar. (The 24 bar is twice as stiff as a 20 mm
bar.) One wheeled bumps should be much stiffer. Two wheeled bumps should be
the same, because the springs are the same.

Lee

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "van Oss" <vanOss@centurytel.net>
To: "Bobby Campbell" <bcampbell10@woh.rr.com>; <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] subframe connectors


> My other guess is that the 91's front might be harsher because of the 24
> (vs. 20) bar, and the rear harsher because of the Cargo Coils (which firm
up
> faster than Eibachs, perhaps?).
>
> I am debating unibody reinforcements for the 91 and just want to get the
> list's advice about whether they might do anything for ride quality.  The
91
> is a daily driver and occasional autocrosser.
>
> VO
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> I also have the tokiko/eibach combo on both front and rear previously my
> 93atx and now my 94mtx. I had the connectors on the 93 and couldn't tell a
> difference with or without them. Won't put them on the 94 for that reason.
A
> buddy here in town had them put on his car with the stock suspension and
it
> really tightened that car up though.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > 91:  Tokicos, Eibach front, Cargo Coil rear, 24/26 bars, delrin RSB
> > bushings, stock slicers/tires
> >
> > 92:  Tokicos, Eibachs, 20/26 bars, 17x45x235, subframe connectors,
> > strut-tower braces
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes

[demime 0.99d.1 removed an attachment of type application/vnd]