[Shotimes] Re: Convention 2004 DVD

Shylo McKinsey mrfluffy02@yahoo.com
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:42:20 -0700 (PDT)


Really? Huh, color me stupid then. I could've sworn I
saw on the SHOtimes website that the dual power seats
were standard. Guess I'll go back (sheepishly) and
look, but...not like it would matter. My bad...

Shylo McKinsey

--- Ron Porter <ronporter@prodigy.net> wrote:

> Maybe your SHO has the optional power passenger
> seat, but it was not
> standard.
> 
> Ron Porter
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Shylo McKinsey
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 11:33 PM
> To: TaurusSHO
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Convention 2004 DVD
> 
> 
> The one thing I've really noticed in the SHO, and
> I've
> rarely seen in ANY other car, (well American and
> Japanese cars...the majority of whats in MT and
> where
> I was in school in NC) is the side bolsters on the
> seats, and the fact that the SHO had dual power
> seats
> up front.
> 
> Shylo McKinsey
> 
> '91 White MTX
> 
> --- Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net> wrote:
> 
> > FYI, the SHO, even in it's most basic form in 1989
> > was 
> > considered a high content car.  Many of the
> features
> > it had 
> > still aren't standard in even some very high
> content
> > cars.
> > 
> > No it isn't the be all and end all, but it never
> was
> > a 
> > "basic" automobile
> > 
> > Don Mallinson
> > 
> > bjshov8 wrote:
> > > The SHO started as a fairly basic automobile,
> > compared to new cars of today.
> > > It is natural for things to evolve, content to
> > increase, expectations to get
> > > higher.  The Altima is probably closer
> > content-wise to the original SHO, but
> > > these days I would be looking at the Max instead
> > of the Altima.  Of course I
> > > would probably be looking at the G35 instead.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>Hard to compare them now, but content-wise, the
> > Altima seems to be closer.
> > >>Maxima is more content, unlike the Maxima of
> old,
> > which was a more direct
> > >>SHO competitor on many fronts. Toss-up on either
> > one, though.
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Shotimes mailing list
> > > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shotimes mailing list
> > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> http://vote.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> 
> 



		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com