: Re: [Shotimes] more codes! sweet.

[Ian Fisher]

I concur. I compared my Pro-M 80 data with Bruce
Malachuk's and was quite pleased to find that mine
flowed a bit more. haha :P

Mine is a few years older. I've heard theories that
their older MAF's were much better in terms of
calibration.

Ian



--- Alan Fanning <Awfanning@earthlink.net> wrote:

> Using somebody else's cal sheet is a bit of a
> conundrum because each Pro-M
> differs slightly from the OEM spec. Thus, you're no
> better off using
> somebody else's cal sheet than you are using the OEM
> spec. I do have a data
> base of several different Pro-M data sheets/MAF's
> though, if that is of
> interest to anybody.
> 
>  Alan
> 
> 
> wrote:
> 
> > : Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:58:52 -0600
> > From: Bill Murray <fordsho@cloud9grafx.com>
> > To: shotimes <shotimes@autox.team.net>;
> > Subject: RE: Re: [Shotimes] more codes! sweet.
> > 
> > Pro-% is out of business, so I doubt you'll be
> able to get in contact witht
> > them.  Which MAF do you have?  Someone may have a
> copy of their sheet which is
> > better then nothing.  If you had access to a
> flowbench though, you could get
> > your own numbers...
> > 
> > Bill
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com