[Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted
Bill Murray
fordsho@cloud9grafx.com
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:29:32 -0600
A properly done exhaust shouldn't lose tq. As I remember Bob gained hp and tq with his exhaust. Terry Richards is running a 3" catback and he gained both as well, he had something like a 30hp boost at the top end, just from the catback upgrade, he aleady had other mods though.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net>
Date: 06/07/05 09:41 AM
To: shotimes@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted
Bill,
I doubt the Dynomax system is the problem. it is bigger than stock and
most people continue to lose torque with bigger and bigger exhaust.
Don
Bill Murray wrote:
>I wonder if the dynomax is holding back power. Bob Bruce gained a decent amount of power when he went to the full 2.5 ich catback, and that was with stock cams. Isn't the dynomax only 2.25"?
>
>Bill Murray
>-----Original Message-----
>From: "Justin Schick" <jschick@aafp.org>
>Date: 06/06/05 11:06 PM
>To: <shotimes@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted
>
>Don,
>
>I've seen a few dyno graphs in my day but am no means adept at deciphering them, and am staring at a so-so laptop LCD. What happened to the performance seems to be what I'd expect with what mods were made. The intake path was opened up and the powerband moved up in the RPM range. The torque curve is now flat as Kansas and great for a track car. This is what I see:
>
>old
>max HP = 205 @ 6200
>max TQ = 195 @ 4750
>
>new
>max HP = 220 @ 6750
>max TQ = 190 @ 3500 - 4000, 4750 - 6000
>red (the first run) was better and more rich.
>
>If you want off idle torque, give it about 6 psi or another half liter of displacement! =)
>
>Justin
>parted 92 - need something (like an intake?)?
>
>
>
>>>>Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net> 6/6/2005 7:45 PM >>>
>>>>
>>>>
>I finally got the prints of my dyno test of the new .20 cam setup. So I
>don't use up bandwidth, I have put the dyno charts up on the shoclub.com
>web site. here is a short link:
>
>http://makeashorterlink.com/?A2625163B
>
>I could not get the new charts on disk so I had to scan all of them.
>
>to my way of thinking, this is a much weaker engine than before.