cams in a 3.2 was RE: Re: [Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted

[Ian Fisher]

Sweet-any adjustable sprocket settings that you
recommend for the street?

What injectors are you using? 

Ian

--- Mark Nunnally <marknunnally@JoiMail.com> wrote:

> > Any speculation as to what kind of tq losses would
> be
> > realized with a bump in displacement? In other
> words,
> > if we can figure out an average of the percent of
> tq
> > lost across the rev band with +20 cams on a 3.0,
> does
> > anyone think that percent average would remain the
> > same or drop if running the cams on a 3.2 (vs
> stock
> > cams or 3.0 cams)?
> 
> Apples to apples (same thing in both motors) I'd say
> ~7% increase (same as
> displacement bump)
> 
> My 3.2L made more torque at mid/low rpm than a same
> BOS 3.0L engine, but
> both engines were making the same torque from about
> 6000 rpm on.  Which
> tells me the cams/intake, etc are a cork for all out
> top end HP on anything
> bigger than 183 CI.
> 
> Thus to answer your question, a 3.2L going from
> stock, to a better breathing
> head/cam/runner is going to probably "wake up" more
> than a 3.0L would.
> 
> mark
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com