cams in a 3.2 was RE: Re: [Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted

[Bruce Malachuk]

IIRC last I knew mark was running stock 3.0 injectors. I will have a set of
3.2 injectors that were cleaned, balanced, and have only been run 6k since
their install. Should have them off the car in a week. With the tweecer and
tuning of injector slopes it was easy to make sure the slightly higer flow
injectors were just right.

I have a set of 30# accels that I want to throw into the car, as per eec
analyzer in theory I should be closing in on the injector's upper end, and
if the SHOshop headers make good numbers and I add them I'm gonna want the
buffer in the % of use. 


Bruce J Malachuk

*	94 Opal Frost MTX 
*	93 Emerald Green MTX - SOLD 
*	93 Black ATX - New Parts CAR 
*	95 Silver Frost ATX SE - SLO -Buyer waiting 
*	96 TR - Cam Failed parts car :-(


-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Ian Fisher
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:46 PM
To: Mark Nunnally; shotimes@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: cams in a 3.2 was RE: Re: [Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted

Sweet-any adjustable sprocket settings that you recommend for the street?

What injectors are you using? 

Ian

--- Mark Nunnally <marknunnally@JoiMail.com> wrote:

> > Any speculation as to what kind of tq losses would
> be
> > realized with a bump in displacement? In other
> words,
> > if we can figure out an average of the percent of
> tq
> > lost across the rev band with +20 cams on a 3.0,
> does
> > anyone think that percent average would remain the same or drop if 
> > running the cams on a 3.2 (vs
> stock
> > cams or 3.0 cams)?
> 
> Apples to apples (same thing in both motors) I'd say ~7% increase 
> (same as displacement bump)
> 
> My 3.2L made more torque at mid/low rpm than a same BOS 3.0L engine, 
> but both engines were making the same torque from about 6000 rpm on.  
> Which tells me the cams/intake, etc are a cork for all out top end HP 
> on anything bigger than 183 CI.
> 
> Thus to answer your question, a 3.2L going from stock, to a better 
> breathing head/cam/runner is going to probably "wake up" more than a 
> 3.0L would.
> 
> mark
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes