[Shotimes] 3.2 vs 3.0 oil pump belt index marks

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:56:49 -0500

Shoot, i dont remember, why dont you check the shopheonxproject site, i 
think he has a detaile pic of a belt, then you can tell which side is which 
from there by looking at how the text is facing.

Frank Costa and the "Silver Bullet" 3.2 and Quaifed
89 Titanium Grey
MODS-
Jose SHOrt shifter
Dynomax Catback With Super Turbo Mufflers
Koni Inserts In The Front
Eibachs In The Front
Monroe Sensatrack Struts In The Rear
Moog Cargo Coils In The Rear
Updated Front Swaybar Endlinks
TPR Everywhere
Solid Delrin Subframe Bushings
Directional Italian SLicers
Bridgestone HP50 Tires All Around
Subframe Connectors
96 Brake Upgrade
SHOnut Rear H Brace
SHOnut Cermaic TOB

HTTP://www.CryoxLabs.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ian Fisher" <dataflash@yahoo.com>
To: "Frank SHOrage Costa" <cryox@comcast.net>; <greensho@crown.net>
Cc: <techsho@topica.com>; <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 3.2 vs 3.0 oil pump belt index marks

> ..and how do I determine which mark on the  belt is
> which?
>
> I figured out that I can determine which side the belt
> faces by counting the ribs. The longer side (distance
> between the rear cam sprocket and the crank) should be
> the tensioner side.
>
> Ian
>
> --- "Frank \"SHOrage\" Costa" <cryox@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Use the 3.0 marks!
>> 3.0 accesories = 3.0 marks
>>
>> Frank Costa and the "Silver Bullet" 3.2 and Quaifed
>> 89 Titanium Grey
>> MODS-
>> Jose SHOrt shifter
>> Dynomax Catback With Super Turbo Mufflers
>> Koni Inserts In The Front
>> Eibachs In The Front
>> Monroe Sensatrack Struts In The Rear
>> Moog Cargo Coils In The Rear
>> Updated Front Swaybar Endlinks
>> TPR Everywhere
>> Solid Delrin Subframe Bushings
>> Directional Italian SLicers
>> Bridgestone HP50 Tires All Around
>> Subframe Connectors
>> 96 Brake Upgrade
>> SHOnut Rear H Brace
>> SHOnut Cermaic TOB
>>
>> HTTP://www.CryoxLabs.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Ian Fisher" <dataflash@yahoo.com>
>> To: <greensho@crown.net>
>> Cc: <techsho@topica.com>; <shotimes@autox.team.net>
>> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 10:14 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 3.2 vs 3.0 oil pump belt
>> index marks
>>
>>
>> > Hmmm..ok, I guess I should've asked:
>> >
>> > Which timing mark do I use if I am using a 3.2 oil
>> > pump on a 3.2 going into an mtx car?
>> >
>> > My Dayco belt has 2 timing marks for the crank
>> > sprocket but they are only one rib apart. I can
>> see
>> > how I could screw up and use either one.
>> >
>> > help!
>> >
>> > Ian
>> >
>> > --- James White <greensho@crown.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> After just finishing the timing belt install,
>> things
>> >> are fresh in
>> >> my memory for a change.
>> >>
>> >> The top two marks are the same, but the bottom
>> mark
>> >> is different
>> >> by about a 1/4".  It was marked as to which was
>> what
>> >> on both the
>> >> new and the old belt.
>> >>
>> >> Likely a function of the different tensioner
>> and/or
>> >> the different
>> >> oil pump.
>> >>
>> >> regards, Jim White - greensho@crown.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> At Monday, 7 November 2005, Ian Fisher
>> >> <dataflash@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Are the timing belt index marks on the 3.0 and
>> the
>> >> 3.2
>> >> >oil pumps the same?
>> >> >
>> >> >thanks
>> >> >Ian
>> >> >
>> >> >__________________________________
>> >> >Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites
>> in
>> >> one click.
>> >> >http://farechase.yahoo.com
>> >> >_______________________________________________
>> >> >Shotimes mailing list
>> >> >Shotimes@autox.team.net
>> >> >http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > __________________________________
>> > Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in
>> one click.
>> > http://farechase.yahoo.com
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Shotimes mailing list
>> > Shotimes@autox.team.net
>> > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
>> >
>> >
>> > -- 
>> > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> > Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 -
>> Release Date: 10/31/2005
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 -
>> Release Date: 10/31/2005
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/162 - Release Date: 11/5/2005
>
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/162 - Release Date: 11/5/2005