[Shotimes] Longest Lived SHO... NON-Rebuilt Motor

C CASSELTON silversho95@msn.com
Thu, 6 Apr 2006 11:36:13 -0700


Well, I think you have to make a distinction between the engines failing and
the associated transmissions failing--as the engine should really be the same,
but some 3.2 will have fallen due to their transmissions and that really can't
be called an engine failure.

And, I think SHOldiers is very appropriate also.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Peter Maggiacomo<mailto:gtsrider@yahoo.com>
  To: shotimes@autox.team.net<mailto:shotimes@autox.team.net>
  Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:17 AM
  Subject: [Shotimes] Longest Lived SHO... NON-Rebuilt Motor


  Every once in a while it's fun to check the list and
  see how these old soldiers, ( or is it SHOldiers?)
  are holding up under year after year road work.
  Who's got a high mileage non-rebuilt motor they want
  to brag about? Which lasts longer, the 3.0 or the 3.2?
  Pete
  95 MTX 92,000 miles (just a Baby)
  _______________________________________________
  Shotimes mailing list
  Shotimes@autox.team.net<mailto:Shotimes@autox.team.net>
  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes<http://www.team.net/mailman/l
istinfo/shotimes>