[Shotimes] driving pet peeves

[Ron Porter]

Yeah, #2 & #3 go together, but I also see #4 as a part of that set by the #3
drivers.

Theoretically, the percent responses for #2 & #3 should be the same (for the
complainers and the complainees), but my theory as to why the #3 item is
3.5% lower than #2 is that a lot of #3-type drivers NEVER, EVER LOOK IN
THEIR REARVIEW MIRRORS so they don't even know when they are being
tailgated!!

I don't at all agree with #1. People are bad-enough drivers anyway. I think
that has become the "pet" excuse for folks today (or a complaint of folks
who don't have a cell phone!). Just driving with a cellphone doesn't produce
bad situations. Besides, I rarely notice folks using cell phones....why are
all of these people nosing into what's going on in cars next to them?? Same
with #9.

Ron Porter 

-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of van Oss
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:21 PM
To: shotimes@autox.team.net
Subject: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves

Check out:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/AUTOS/05/04/pet_peeves/index.html

Funny:  Seems like #2 and 3 are a set, and #4, 5, and 6 are a set.

VO
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes