[Shotimes] 95 3.2 with 3.0 intake and cams?

[Jon Heese]

Forgot to mention the intake:  I'm not sure if there are any major
differences between the 3.0 and 3.2 intakes (besides the stickers,
obviously), but I'd imagine this was done for looks.  Maybe the original
KOB intake was scratched or polished due to bad motor mounts.

Either way, I'd bet dollars to donuts that this is a simple matter of a
DIY parts swap.

Regards,
Jon Heese

Robert M. wrote:
>         Whats up all? I havend been posting in a while and have a question. Im a technician at a Ford dealership and a real nice 95 SHO automatic came in the shop the other day. I got an estimate for the repairs he was wanting done and after getting the parts in, I tore into it this morning. I was looking at the intake and the cams and it had KOA on them. The car is stock from what I can tell and is real clean with low mileage. The rear valve cover had a KOB sticker which from what I know, represents a 3.2. The cams and intake had KOA cast on them, which represents a 3.0. Is it common for a 3.2 to have 3.0 parts on them like this one has? Thanks guys for helping me with this.
>    
>   Robert Miller
>   93 SHO, still parked
>   89 Thunderbird SC
>                                                         
>       
> 
>        
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes at autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes