You wrote - I don't know if you've been following the Buick/Rover 215 ci engine thread. I have not seen any messages on this conversion. Would you please forward more information? Thanx. Tom
-------------------------------------- Date: 6/26/96 11:26 PM To: T Wiencek From: lallegrucci(at)westpub.com Scot,
I don't know if you've been following the Buick/Rover 215 ci engine thread. It
seems your conversion is more practical, but still retains the spirit of the Alpine: a light, good handling, relatively reliable car. Perhaps you could shed some light. Like when did you last do a valve adjustment...
Brian
67 Alpine work in progress 72 MGB-GT daily driver
------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by qmgate_backup.anl.gov with SMTP;26 Jun 1996 23:25:04 U Received: from localhost (daemon(at)localhost) by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.6.12/) with SMTP id AAA13177; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 00:22:10 -0400 Received: (from majordom(at)localhost) by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.6.12/) id AAA13162 for alpines-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 00:22:06 -0400 From: lallegrucci(at)westpub.com Message-Id: <9606270415.AA13692(at)westpub.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 27 Jun 96 00:23:17 -0600 Subject: Re: oldest alpine To: srohr(at)ix.netcom.com (Scott Rohr), alpines(at)autox.team.net In-Reply-To: <199606261455.HAA00894(at)dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com> Sender: owner-alpines(at)triumph.cs.utah.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-To: lallegrucci(at)westpub.com