Richard Atherton (Entex) wrote:
>
> I always felt the the stock 3.89:1 rear ends were to low to
> begin with, and going even lower to 4.55:1 would keep if off the
> freeways forever. I always felt that the perfect ratio was around
> 3.24:1 The Tigers 2.88 would have been too high. The 73' Datsun 510
> wagon rear end that I bought for my conversion project had 3.24. I was
> told that it used the same gear set as the 240 - 260 Z's. I figureed it
> would be tough enough.
I know I said "increase ratio" when I meant "decrease ratio." What is
involved in such a project? replacing a ring gear or the whole rear end?
Siegfred
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 09:39:56 CDT