On Tue, 30 Sep 1997 17:27:50 -0700 jerome(at)supernet.ab.ca (Jerome Yuzyk)
writes:
Someone wrote...
>> Problem is that the PH-8 is even bigger and takes even more time to
>> refill on starting.
>>
Jerome wrote,
>
>Fram also specifies a PH-16, half-size of PH-8. I bought one of each,
>then someone mentioned that bigger is better because of an enlarged
>filter surface. Now you're saying upside-down-bigger is not better?
No, I think there are two distinct ideals here.
1)
The PH16 would be best in the normal mounting config due to lower volume.
2)
The PH8 would be best in an inverted mounting config due to lower
restriction,
higher filtration.
Jarrid Gross
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 09:57:53 CDT