Re: Re: FW: [rro] Re: RRO: RE: Pros and Cons: 1994 Range Rover

[FOSmith@aol.com]

In a message dated 7/12/1 11:05:20 AM, barrier@bconnex.net wrote:

>Essentially the 4.2 is a 3.9 with longer stroking crank, skimmed pistons 
>and same rods, ( piston crown is thinner)
>Its not a bad engine its just that with the new 4.6 cross-bolted short 
>engine being so cheap, buying or upgrading 4.2's seems a poor value 
>exercise by comparison.

///
///  buick-rover-v8@autox.team.net mailing list
///