fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR4 puzzler - oil system

To: <Gt6steve@aol.com>, <FOT@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: TR4 puzzler - oil system
From: "Dean Tetterton" <Richtr@erols.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:38:02 -0400
The TR4 does feed two rods from the center main and the first press in cam
bearing.
Didn't some Spitfire racers drill the crank to connect #1 to 2 and # 4 to 3?
I seem
to remember this being done in the past and I think it helped. Any old
Spitfire racers
out there?
Dean Tetterton

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Gt6steve@aol.com>
To: <FOT@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 11:26 AM
Subject: TR4 puzzler - oil system


> I may be showing my ignorance here but does the TR4 have three mains like
the
> Spits?  # 1 main feeds #1 rod.  #2 main feeds two rods, 2& 3 and rear main
> feeds #4 rod and cam?  So the center main feeds two rods while the outers
only
> feed one?  Or am I all wet?
>
> Steve, who's not real clever on oiling lately...
>
> It seems that when a rod fails, it is mostly #2 and / or #3.
>
> What puzzles me about this is that I would think it would be #1, but that
> seldom happens. Why would I think this?
> Return-path: <Gt6steve@aol.com>
> From: Gt6steve@aol.com
> Full-name: Gt6steve
> Message-ID: <dc.dc495ea.2e0c4c4e@aol.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:25:02 EDT
> Subject: Re: TR4 puzzler - oil system
> To: vinttr4@geneseo.net
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5032
> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.99d.1
> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
>
> I may be showing my ignorance here but does the TR4 have three mains like
the
> Spits?  # 1 main feeds #1 rod.  #2 main feeds two rods, 2& 3 and rear main
> feeds #4 rod and cam?  So the center main feeds two rods while the outers
only
> feed one?  Or am I all wet?
>
> Steve, who's not real clever on oiling lately...
>
> It seems that when a rod fails, it is mostly #2 and / or #3.
>
> What puzzles me about this is that I would think it would be #1, but that
> seldom happens. Why would I think this?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>