Dave; Yes. At that time it was my understanding that my Vega was almost
"Production" according to FIA. I do not understand how that can be, but
thats what I was told. Rich Fox
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
To: Richard Fox <v4gr@rcn.com>
Cc: John Beckett <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net>;
land-speed@autox.team.net <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: FIA car classes
>are you saying then the FIA version of production on has to
>do with anything that might effect the aero then? So a
>highly modified car that has not changed anything on the
>body is production and just has to be in the appropriate
>engine class?
>Dave
>
>Richard Fox wrote:
>>
>> -----List; As I posted once before when Bruce was running the LSA thing
at
>> Bonneville my Vega was almost legal for "Production" acording to the
rules
>> Bruce showed me. Only the removale of my drip rails disqualifed the car.
>> This is a tube frame Vega with a tube front axle, narrowed 9 inch rear,
and
>> at the time a Kinsler injected 468 inch Pontiac set back 25%. Air scoop
>> through the windshield and all. So I would assume (I know) that Keith's
>> Camaro could run in FIA "production". Rich Fox
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///
|