Yeah, I think that's basically correct as far as FIA is concerned.
Production means stock body. Actually Keith's car with headlight covers and
non stock spoilers probably wouldn't meet the rules. Well he can still run
as a Streamliner.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
To: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>
Cc: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; "Keith Turk"
<kturk@ala.net>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: FIA car classes
> are you saying then the FIA version of production on has to
> do with anything that might effect the aero then? So a
> highly modified car that has not changed anything on the
> body is production and just has to be in the appropriate
> engine class?
> Dave
>
> Richard Fox wrote:
> >
> > -----List; As I posted once before when Bruce was running the LSA thing
at
> > Bonneville my Vega was almost legal for "Production" acording to the
rules
> > Bruce showed me. Only the removale of my drip rails disqualifed the car.
> > This is a tube frame Vega with a tube front axle, narrowed 9 inch rear,
and
> > at the time a Kinsler injected 468 inch Pontiac set back 25%. Air scoop
> > through the windshield and all. So I would assume (I know) that Keith's
> > Camaro could run in FIA "production". Rich Fox
> > From: John Beckett <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>
> > To: Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net>; land-speed@autox.team.net
> > <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> > Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 11:13 AM
> > Subject: FIA car classes
> >
> > >Here is one of the legitimate problems when considering the FIA for
> > >international LSR leadership. Basically there are two categories:
> > Production
> > >and everything else. Obviously pitting Keith's Camaro against Jacks 300
MPH
> > >liner is no contest.
> > >WE can do better.
> > >
> > >John Beckett
> > >----- Original Message -----
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///
|