land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: News on Our Car Magazine Industry : Strictly for theBUCKS!

To: David Freiburger <FreiburD@PRIMEDIAcmmg.com>
Subject: Re: News on Our Car Magazine Industry : Strictly for theBUCKS!
From: "Bryan A. Savage Jr" <basavage@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:09:30 -0800
Thank you David for taking your time to educate me, I always need it.

My son the fireman relates this story:
A new Battalion Chief started his first meeting with;
" Good morning, I need volunteers. Will all of you who
think life should be fair take one step forward. "

Bryan
  


David Freiburger wrote:
> 
> OK, I've tried to ignore this string, but I'm getting too annoyed. Here goes. 
>It's long, so delete now and save the boredom if you don't care.
> 
> - Hot Rod magazine remains "at the top of the heap for its demographic target 
>group." Circulation-wise, it is over twice the size of the next biggest 
>performance-car magazine, which is Car Craft.
> 
> - True, Hot Rod's size has diminished steadily over the last 15 years. Why? 
>Because 15 years ago there were roughly 20 automotive titles. Now there are 
>over 200. During the glory days of Hot Rod that many of you remember, it was 
>just one of 4 or 5 titles and there was no TV or internet coverage of similar 
>material.
> 
> - There is increasing focus on the "kids" and the "import crowd." While this 
>segment has certainly affected the mainstream performance magazines--and while 
>the aftermarket is aggressively jumping on the import bandwagon--you need to 
>recognize that it is still a micro-niche. Put all three of the big 
>import-tuner magazines together and the circulation is still less than that of 
>Car Craft alone. Remember that Sport Truck magazine and the sport truck 
>movement was all the rage 10 years ago, with similar hype that the import 
>crowd has now. Predictably, its popularity followed a bell-shaped curve that 
>the import scene will likely follow.
> 
> - The best thing magazine marketers have behind them is that readers consider 
>the titles "theirs." Look at the title of this thread: "Our car magazine 
>industry."  That means we have passionate consumers. It also means that those 
>zealots throw darts at major companies that do things like kill Drag Racing 
>USA magazine. That magazine had a circulation of about 19,000 total, making it 
>tiny and unprofitable (just like every drag racing magazine since the mid 
>'80s). Those of you who thought it was totally unfair for the company to kill 
>it should have talked everyone you know into buying it.
> 
> - Strictly for the bucks? Of course. How many of you would continue to run a 
>businesses or manufacture a product at a loss? When people don't buy a 
>product, that product goes away. Witness the Camaro.
> 
> - I've found that readers in the automotive performance segment really enjoy 
>bashing the magazines and often do it from an extremely narrow, personal point 
>of view. They also buy into the "ivory tower" theory of how our business is 
>run. They panic rampantly over baseless internet gossip, and frequently take 
>at face value the supposed inside information from people who are far removed 
>from the know. Seemingly, the greatest celebrity is to be had by associating 
>yourself with the magazine business just closely enough to be considered an 
>authority when criticizing it.
> Further, it's the special-interest groups who moan the loudest that a 
>magazine does not cover their affinity subject, then complains the most 
>bitterly when that subject is not covered up to their standards.
> 
> Finally, in support of those who feel the magazines have slipped lately, let 
>me offer this: I agree that many magazines produced these days are pure 
>schlock. Since I spend about 100 hours a week trying to avoid that, I also 
>know how difficult it is produce those magazines in a world of ever-decreasing 
> budgets and resources. I also worry about the monopoly that the car-mag 
>industry has become, but you should know that the former Petersen titles are 
>largely unaffected by the recent merger. No one has messed with Hot Rod at all 
>(except me). The magazines are definitely more advertiser-driven than they 
>were 20 years ago, but remember that Robert Petersen started this company to 
>sell ads, not to be a great guy. Nothing's changed, yet the climate of America 
>is more corporate than ever. Complain about that as loudly as you want. Have 
>you ever griped to Universal Studios because there's too much product 
>placement in a movie? Do you watch the commercials on rented videos? Did you 
>turn off
> the Superbowl because it was sponsored? Ever skip an Aerosmith concert 
>because they're backed by Dodge? Or Pepsi and Brittany Spears? Do you stop 
>riding the bus because there's an ad on the side? Have you stopped using the 
>internet because of pop-up ads? Advertising is an American problem.
> 
> Finally, remember that the vast majority of us on the editorial side are just 
>regular car guys doing their best to provide fun, good information under 
>brutal deadlines. I've barely scratched the surface of the improvement that I 
>feel is needed at this magazine, but when you write a generic "Hot Rod sucks" 
>letter, you're hitting us where we live. I want every piece of constructive 
>input you can give me. But skip the speculative, whiny blather.
> 
> David Freiburger
> Editor In Chief
> Hot Rod Magazine
> 
> >>> wspotter <wester6935@home.com> 11/12/01 8:08:05 PM >>>
> Yeah,  Saturday Evening Post, Life, Look, Readers Digest, even Esquire ...
> used to be the top of the heap for their demographic target group just like
> Hot Rod.  Today ... competition either drove them under or to drastic
> changes.  The quick, gossip, flash stuff showing lots of skin on both sexes
> is what moves today.  Guess that's why we are on the internet.
> 
> Wes
> 
> on 11/12/01 10:43 AM, Nt788@aol.com at Nt788@aol.com wrote:
> 
> > When I was a kid in 1940 walking to school, a Model T speedster would often
> > pass by. My reaction to this old guy and his Mom was something like, what a
> > stupid old guy driving that worthless antique! I would guess that's what the
> > "kids" now say about me in my roadster! Simple math tells me who's buying 
>the
> > most magazines now! I'll bet the mag. bean counters also know! Times they 
>are
> > a changing! Jack

///
///  land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe land-speed
///
///  or go to  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>