land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The Real Difference: Hemi vs Ford & Chev

To: landspeedracer <landspeedracer@msn.com>, land-speed@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: The Real Difference: Hemi vs Ford & Chev
From: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 18:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Thanks, John.  Those ARE impressive numbers.  But
ya gotta admit, those hemi numbers look good too,
especially from a fifty year old motor!  And, I
can buy six hemis for the price of a set of those
Brodix heads.  Hee hee hee  But, I gotta admit, I
didn't think the SBC (Even Brodix)  flowed that
much. Those would be just about the most one
could expect to get from a SBC, wouldn't they?

Dick J

--- landspeedracer <landspeedracer@msn.com>
wrote:
> Dick
> 
> Here are some intake numbers for a new Brodix
> chevy ported head @28" H2O.
> 
> .200" - 156 cfm
> .300  - 237
> .400  - 301
> .500  - 347
> .600  - 374
> .700  - 395
> .800  - 401
> 
> JB
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dick J" <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
> To: <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 7:31 PM
> Subject: The Real Difference: Hemi vs Ford &
> Chev 
> 
> 
> > Specifically, I was comparing intake flow of
> a
> > stock 1955 Chrysler 354 hemi and a ported
> > Chrysler 354 hemi with some figures I had in
> a
> > magazine for common SBC GM and aftermarket
> heads.
> >  I found that the old hemi outflowed any of
> the
> > heads listed in the article I had. I can't
> find
> > the magazine with the SBC numbers as I have
> just
> > boxed up a bunch of magazines in my annual
> > cleanup to make room for new Christmas
> > subscriptions.  If anybody has flow numbers
> for
> > SBC though, I would like to compare them with
> the
> > old hemi.  Here's what the 1955 Chrysler hemi
> > flowed at 28 inches:
> > .200 lift  121 stock   125 ported
> > .300 lift  178 stock   200 ported
> > .400 lift  212 stock   261 ported
> > .500 lift  225 stock   287 ported
> > .600 lift  233 stock   313 ported
> > .700 lift              416 ported (modified
> for
> > racing)
> > 
> > Personally, I think those numbers look pretty
> > good, even today.  Does anybody have any
> numbers
> > on any SBC that flows more than that?  Most
> > old-time hemi guys felt that the smaller
> Desoto
> > flowed even better than the Chrysler, because
> the
> > ports were straighter.  I dunno, my motors
> are
> > all nearly stock, but I still love every
> rusted
> > bolt in them!
> > 
> > Dick J   

///
///  land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe land-speed
///
///  or go to  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>