land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fw: Re: SCTA motorcycle modified wheelbase maximum (pt 1)

To: todd <todd@twinjugs.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: SCTA motorcycle modified wheelbase maximum (pt 1)
From: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 20:41:56 -0700
thats great...

fine I will play the game

I was being an idiot the last 10 yrs with
my bike at 68 ", because the rule
WAS 72" max for modified( for like 30+ yrs)

guess I will run my chain tight for altered class
and loose for modified class

Joe :)

todd wrote:

>Joe, talked to Wink and it's verified.... Must be a "minimum" of 68" wb to 
>run in an altered class. That's the best way to put it as that is the 
>reasoning behind it. In other words, although 68" is the maximum you can have 
>to run in modified it was setup more for the fact of keeping it as a minimum 
>for altered. I'm not going into the why the decision was made and all as 
>that's SCTA's decision and up to someone like Wink to explain, but the way I 
>understand it is if you don't have a 68"+ wheelbase you aren't going to run 
>in an altered class under SCTA... and ECTA is following suit as much as 
>possible to some point(to be decided).
>I can't speak for SCTA and barely for ECTA at this point, but it is being 
>looked at by ECTA for those that have ran modified in the past and what kind 
>of bi to enact for entrants that can show they've ran their 68"-72" bike in a 
>modified class in the past(Maybe a 1 year grandfathering clause as you 
>mention would be good? SCTA is not going to do this though and it's possible 
>that ECTA will not either, time will tell).
>I've found a couple little things I can do to suffice my bike I'm building as 
>it hasn't ran in a modified class in it's present for6m(ie: new wheelbase). I 
>think it's only right I make the neccesary changes to abide by the new ruling 
>for that reason. That and the fact that if I start running altered I will 
>have to change way more then the wheelbase to be able to take full advantage 
>of the altered class(ie: smaller fuel cell, lower seating, foot control 
>positioning, etc.) as i've built this to take the modified class to it's 
>fullest extent for both maxton and bonnevile).
>Hope this helps and I might be able to answer a couple questions on it but 
>you may want to wait to call SCTA until after the rulebook is in your hand
>(should be very shortly). And ECTA questions should probably be held off 
>another week or two for a final decision to be made. 
>Todd Dross

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
///  what is needed.  It isn't that difficult, folks.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>