land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rws

To: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>,
Subject: Re: rws
From: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:25:42 -0700
Shame on you Dave :(........ J.D.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
To: "john robinson" <john@engr.wisc.edu>
Cc: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: rws


> Don't let that phrase of 'unlimited innovation' fool you too much The
innovation
> is very closely regulated and controlled in all ways. if it were unlimited
i
> could build a RWS car with traction control and drive by wire but i
suspect it
> could not get in for time only so save your breath. What it is in reality
is the
> amount of innovation that can and will be tolerated by the car clubs in So
Cal
> area.... Lets all say points championship one more time for the lakes
meets and
> lets have the chorus really belt it out so we are all in agreement on this
> fact..
>
> Dave Dahlgren
>
> john robinson wrote:
> >
> > partly this discussion is just an exercise in bench racing, partly its'
> > because the powers that be have restricted the Streamliner class lately,
> > re: no RWS, no Traction control, partly because a few of us are
> > inquisitive...and partly because somebody did try to use it, and maybe
> > somebody else still wants to try...the Streamliner class rules begins by
> > stating it is for unlimited innovation, this is innovation, maybe not
> > what >you< would want to try, but it still is innovative.....





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>