land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Solid mounted axel?

To: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>,
Subject: Re: Solid mounted axel?
From: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:25:22 -0400
Also having run both, the suspended car is so much easier to drive. Yes its
more work to build and set up but the handling improvement is worth it.

BTW a long WB car with a little chassis flex rides reasonably well at
Bonneville, but do you really want any chassis flex?

JB
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
To: "Hal Worcester" <HWorcester@AdvancedPower.com>
Cc: <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: Solid mounted axel?


> Hal,
>
> Having run both solid and sprung, I vote for sprung if only 1 inch of
> travel.
>
> Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/FCC
>
> Hal Worcester wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >   I am building a new car for LSR and have a question? I am
> > contemplating mounting a 9" Ford axel in the rear to replace the stock
> > independent suspension.
> >
> >   What are the pro's and cons of solid mounting this? It would be very
> > easy to build to the stock IRS carrier mounts from the original leaf
> > spring mounts on the axel instead of building a new suspension for just
> > a couple of inches travel.






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>